Lack of Equity, Quality Push Standards Forward in '90s

In 1994, the U.S. Department of Education, under President Clinton, released a startling report that documented how much less learning was expected of children in poor schools than in other schools (OERI, 1994). Researchers examined the math and English grades received by a sampling of students from poor and affluent schools and com[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"wysiwyg","fid":"935","attributes":{"alt":"One \nSchool","title":"","class":"media-image","typeof":"foaf:Image","wysiwyg":1,"width":"250","height":"408","style":"float: left"}}]]pared these grades with the students' actual math achievement using test scores from the 1988 National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS:88). They found that, on average, students with the same knowledge of math earned a "D" if they attended a low-poverty school—but earned an "A" if they attended a high-poverty school. (Results were similar for English.) In short, students in high-poverty schools were held to lower standards than were their middle-class counterparts.

Then in 1995 came TIMSS, the Third International Math and Science Study, which compared student achievement in 41 countries (Beaton et al., 1996). On the 8th-grade math assessment, 25 countries met the study's methodological requirements. Of these 25, U.S. achievement was surpassed by 14 countries, including all the Asian and about half the European countries. News stories were quick to point out that the countries we "beat" were the vastly poorer Lithuania, Cyprus, Portugal, and Iran.

Concerns about the lack of equity and quality among America's schools weighed heavily on the minds of governors, especially in the poorer South. Standards-based reform received an additional boost from RAND researchers David Grissmer and Ann Flanagan's reports (1998, 2000) showing that the two states with an early commitment to standards and accountability—Texas and North Carolina—were posting the greatest gains on NAEP. Grissmer and Flanagan reviewed NAEP data from 1992–1996 and found that, when controlling for demographic factors, North Carolina and Texas had "greater combined student achievement gains in math and reading than any other states." According to the researchers, in addition to having in place such prerequisites as pre-K and smaller classes for low-income students, "the most plausible explanation [is] found in the policy environment ... the keys ... include[d]: creating an aligned system of standards, curriculum, and assessments; [and] holding schools accountable for improvement by all students."



Achieve (2004). Do Graduation Tests Measure Up? Washington, D.C.: Achieve, Inc.

Barnett, W.S., (2005). Personal communication.

Barnett, W.S., Huystedt, J.T., Robin, K.B., Schulman, K.L. (2004). The State of Preschool: 2004 State Preschool Yearbook. New Brunswick, N.J.: National Institute for Early Education Research.

Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.

Center on Education Policy (2005). From the Capital to the Classroom: Year 3 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, D.C.: Center for Education Policy Report.

Johnson, J., Duffett, A., Vine, J., and Moye, L. (2003). Where We Are Now: 12 Things You Need to Know about Public Opinion and Public Schools. New York: Public Agenda.

National Center for Education Statistics (2001). Entering Kindergarten: A Portrait of American Children When They Begin School: Findings from the Condition of Education 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

Rebell, M. (2004). Adequacy Litigations: A New Path to Equity? New York, N.Y.: ACCESS, a project of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity.

Roderick, M., Engel, M., Nagaoka, J., et al. (February 2003). Ending Social Promotion, Results from Summer Bridge. Chicago, Ill.: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Rose, L. and Gallup, A. (September 1998). "The 30th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools." Phi Delta Kappan.

Rose, L. and Gallup, A. (September 2002). "The 34th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools." Phi Delta Kappan.

Snipes, J., Doolittle F. and Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for Success: Case Studies of How Urban School Systems Improve Student Achievement. Washington, D.C.: Council of Great City Schools.

Vock, D. (2004). "Standards push helps lawsuits: Simply filing a suit—or threatening to—can spur reform. Then political organizing kicks in." Catalyst, April 2004.

White, E. (August 13, 1983). "Poll Finds Public Endorsement of School Reforms." Education Week.

Related Articles

Getting Back on Course
Standards-Based Reform and Accountability
By Lauren Resnick and Chris Zurawsky

An American Revolution: A Common Curriculum
By Albert Shanker

Lack of Equity, Quality Push Standards Forward in '90s

Standards-Based Reform Brings New Attention to Key Elements Necessary for Improving Student Achievement

American Educator, Spring 2005