American Federation of Teachers - A Union of Professionals

Skip directly to:

AFT - A Union of ProfessionalsTeachersHigher EducationPSRPPublic EmployeesHealthcareRetireesEarly Childhood Educators

Home > Hot Topics > School Improvement >  

Redesigning Schools to Raise Achievement:
Key Components

    Print 


A fair school improvement process—one that is sympathetic and respectful of the challenges students and staff in low-performing schools must face each day—is more likely to be accepted. Arbitrary and imposed solutions are not likely to succeed. Neither are those that are experimental or those that have failed to produce results in many other settings. Therefore, an emphasis must be placed on selecting research-based programs and approaches that have a successful track record.

Indicators of Low-Performing Schools
The initial identification of low-performing schools should be made using criteria that are fair and widely accepted.

School Audit Process
The use of fair indicators is just the beginning of a sound school improvement process. School systems must not only identify which schools are in trouble, but also why. Once schools have been identified, it is important to investigate to determine the origins of the school's problems, which, in turn, can help to suggest the most appropriate and effective solutions.

Selecting an Improvement Program
Since it is largely up to school staff to make the great efforts necessary to turn the school around, they should have a major voice in selecting the research-based solutions to be implemented. By guaranteeing that staff play a formal role in program selection, the school also benefits from their expertise as educators and provides them with a greater stake in making the program work.

Building on the Best: Learning from What Works
While each low-performing school has a somewhat different set of needs and priorities, the AFT believes that no school—especially one that is already foundering—should be expected to find success by reinventing the wheel. Instead, once the school's most pressing problems have been identified, the improvement process should focus on enabling the faculty to choose among those programs and instructional practices that have a solid base of research showing positive results. The AFT's What Works series was designed to provide members with detailed background information about the research-based strategies that, when properly implemented, show promise for helping to raise academic achievement, especially for struggling students.

The Importance of Staff 'Buy-in' in the Selection of Proven Programs
Researchers, program developers, policy analysts, and educators have all noted that a program's success depends upon the commitment of teachers and other school staff to the program prior to its implementation. 


AFT Resources
AFT's Suggested Checklist for Ensuring a Fair and Effective School Improvement Process 

Selecting a School Improvement Program

AFT Resources
Choosing Success, American Educator, Fall 1998  

Far and Wide, American Educator, Fall 1998 

Seeing Progress: A Guide to Visiting Schools Using Promising Programs 

Additional Resources
Guidelines of Quality, New American Schools, 2000

Working Together for Reliable School Reform, Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University, Spring 2000

Evaluating Whole-School Reform Efforts: A Guide for District and School Staff, Mid-Continent Regional Education Lab, 1999

How to Build Support for Comprehensive Reform, New American Schools, 1999

Building on the Best: Learning from What Works
An Educator's Guide to Schoolwide Reform, American Institutes for Research, 1999 

Better By Design? A Consumer's Guide to Schoolwide Reform, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 1999

people picture
American Federation of Teachers | 555 New Jersey Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001

© American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer
Photographs and illustrations, as well as text, cannot be used without permission from the AFT.