|
|
 |
 |

Spring 2003
The Early Catastrophe
The 30 Million Word Gap
by Age 3
Betty
Hart and Todd R. Risley
During the 1960’s War on Poverty, we were among the many
researchers, psychologists, and educators who brought our knowledge of child
development to the front line in an optimistic effort to intervene early to
forestall the terrible effects that poverty was having on some children’s
academic growth. We were also among the many who saw that our results,
however promising at the start, washed out fairly early and fairly
completely as children aged.
In one planned intervention in Kansas City, Kans., we used our experience
with clinical language intervention to design a half-day program for the
Turner House Preschool, located in the impoverished Juniper Gardens area of
the city. Most interventions of the time used a variety of methods and then
measured results with IQ tests, but ours focused on building the everyday
language the children were using, then evaluating the growth of that
language. In addition, our study included not just poor children from Turner
House, but also a group of University of Kansas professors’ children against
whom we could measure the Turner House children’s progress.
All the children in the program eagerly engaged with the wide variety of new
materials and language-intensive activities introduced in the preschool. The
spontaneous speech data we collected showed a spurt of new vocabulary words
added to the dictionaries of all the children and an abrupt acceleration in
their cumulative vocabulary growth curves. But just as in other early
intervention programs, the increases were temporary.
We found we could easily increase the size of the children’s vocabularies by
teaching them new words. But we could not accelerate the rate of vocabulary
growth so that it would continue beyond direct teaching; we could not change
the developmental trajectory. However many new words we taught the children
in the preschool, it was clear that a year later, when the children were in
kindergarten, the effects of the boost in vocabulary resources would have
washed out. The children’s developmental trajectories of vocabulary growth
would continue to point to vocabulary sizes in the future that were
increasingly discrepant from those of the professors’ children. We saw
increasing disparity between the extremes--the fast vocabulary growth of the
professors’ children and the slow vocabulary growth of the Turner House
children. The gap seemed to foreshadow the findings from other studies that
in high school many children from families in poverty lack the vocabulary
used in advanced textbooks.
Rather than concede to the unmalleable forces of heredity, we decided that
we would undertake research that would allow us to understand the disparate
developmental trajectories we saw. We realized that if we were to understand
how and when differences in developmental trajectories began, we needed to
see what was happening to children at home at the very beginning of their
vocabulary growth.
We undertook 2 1/2 years of observing 42 families for an
hour each month to learn about what typically went on in homes with 1- and
2-year-old children learning to talk. The data showed us that ordinary
families differ immensely in the amount of experience with language and
interaction they regularly provide their children and that differences in
children’s experience are strongly linked to children’s language
accomplishments at age 3. Our goal in the longitudinal study was to discover
what was happening in children’s early experience that could account for the
intractable difference in rates of vocabulary growth we saw among
4-year-olds.
Methodology
Our ambition was to record "everything" that went on in children’s
homes--everything that was done by the children, to them, and around them.
Because we were committed to undertaking the labor involved in observing,
tape recording, and transcribing, and because we did not know exactly which
aspects of children’s cumulative experience were contributing to
establishing rates of vocabulary growth, the more information we could get
each time we were in the home the more we could potentially learn.
We decided to start when the children were 7-9 months old so we would have
time for the families to adapt to observation before the children actually
began talking. We followed the children until they turned three years old.
The first families we recruited to participate in the study came from
personal contacts: friends who had babies and families who had had children
in the Turner House Preschool. We then used birth announcements to send
descriptions of the study to families with children of the desired age. In
recruiting from birth announcements, we had two priorities. The first
priority was to obtain a range in demographics, and the second was
stability--we needed families likely to remain in the longitudinal study for
several years. Recruiting from birth announcements allowed us to preselect
families. We looked up each potential family in the city directory and
listed those with such signs of permanence as owning their home and having a
telephone. We listed families by sex of child and address because
demographic status could be reliably associated with area of residence in
this city at that time. Then we sent recruiting letters selectively in order
to maintain the gender balance and the representation of socioeconomic
strata.
Our final sample consisted of 42 families who remained in the study from
beginning to end. From each of these families, we have almost 2 1/2 years or
more of sequential monthly hour-long observations. On the basis of
occupation, 13 of the families were upper socioeconomic status (SES), 10
were middle SES, 13 were lower SES, and six were on welfare. There were
African-American families in each SES category, in numbers roughly
reflecting local job allocations. One African-American family was upper SES,
three were middle, seven were lower, and six families were on welfare. Of
the 42 children, 17 were African American and 23 were girls. Eleven children
were the first born to the family, 18 were second children, and 13 were
third or later-born children.
What We Found
Before children can take charge of their own experience and begin to spend
time with peers in social groups outside the home, almost everything they
learn comes from their families, to whom society has assigned the task of
socializing children. We were not surprised to see the 42 children turn out
to be like their parents; we had not fully realized, however, the
implications of those similarities for the children’s futures.
We observed the 42 children grow more like their parents in stature and
activity levels, in vocabulary resources, and in language and interaction
styles. Despite the considerable range in vocabulary size among the
children, 86 percent to 98 percent of the words recorded in each child’s
vocabulary consisted of words also recorded in their parents’ vocabularies.
By the age of 34-36 months, the children were also talking and using numbers
of different words very similar to the averages of their parents (see the
table below).
|
Families’ Language and Use Differ Across Income Groups |
| |
Families |
| |
13 Professional
|
23 Working-class
|
6 Welfare |
|
Measures & Scores |
Parent |
Child |
Parent |
Child |
Parent |
Child |
|
Protest scorea |
41 |
|
31 |
|
14 |
|
Recorded
vocabulary
size |
2,176 |
1,116 |
1,498 |
749 |
974 |
525 |
Average
utterances per
hourb |
487 |
310 |
301 |
223 |
176 |
168 |
Average different
words per hour |
382 |
297 |
251 |
216 |
167 |
149 |
|
a
When we began the longitudinal study, we asked the parents to complete a
vocabulary pretest. At the first observation each parent was asked to
complete a form abstracted from the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT).
We gave each parent a list of 46 vocabulary words and a series of
pictures (four options per vocabulary word) and asked the parent to
write beside each word the number of the picture that corresponded to
the written word. Parent performance on the test was highly correlated
with years of education (r = .57). |
|
b
Parent utterances and different words were averaged over 13-36 months of
child age. Child utterances and different words were averaged for the
four observations when the children were 33-36 months old. |
By the time the children were 3 years old, trends in amount of talk,
vocabulary growth, and style of interaction were well established and
clearly suggested widening gaps to come. Even patterns of parenting were
already observable among the children. When we listened to the children, we
seemed to hear their parents speaking; when we watched the children play at
parenting their dolls, we seemed to see the futures of their own children.
We now had answers to our 20-year-old questions. We had observed, recorded,
and analyzed more than 1,300 hours of casual interactions between parents
and their language-learning children. We had dissembled these interactions
into several dozen molecular features that could be reliably coded and
counted. We had examined the correlations between the quantities of each of
those features and several outcome measures relating to children’s language
accomplishments.
After all 1,318 observations had been entered into the computer and checked
for accuracy against the raw data, after every word had been checked for
spelling and coded and checked for its part of speech, after every utterance
had been coded for syntax and discourse function and every code checked for
accuracy, after random samples had been recoded to check the reliability of
the coding, after each file had been checked one more time and the accuracy
of each aspect verified, and after the data analysis programs had finally
been run to produce frequency counts and dictionary lists for each
observation, we had an immense numeric database that required 23 million
bytes of computer file space. We were finally ready to begin asking what it
all meant.
 |
It took six years of painstaking effort before we saw the first results of
the longitudinal research. And then we were astonished at the differences
the data revealed (see the graph at left).
Like the children in the Turner House Preschool, the three
year old children from families on welfare not only had smaller vocabularies
than did children of the same age in professional families, but they were
also adding words more slowly. Projecting the developmental trajectory of
the welfare children’s vocabulary growth curves, we could see an
ever-widening gap similar to the one we saw between the Turner House
children and the professors’ children in 1967.
While we were immersed in collecting and processing the data, our thoughts
were concerned only with the next utterance to be transcribed or coded.
While we were observing in the homes, though we were aware that the families
were very different in lifestyles, they were all similarly engaged in the
fundamental task of raising a child. All the families nurtured their
children and played and talked with them. They all disciplined their
children and taught them good manners and how to dress and toilet
themselves. They provided their children with much the same toys and talked
to them about much the same things. Though different in personality and
skill levels, the children all learned to talk and to be socially
appropriate members of the family with all the basic skills needed for
preschool entry.
Test Performance in Third Grade Follows
Accomplishments at Age 3
We wondered whether the differences we saw at age 3 would be washed out,
like the effects of a preschool intervention, as the children’s experience
broadened to a wider community of competent speakers. Like the parents we
observed, we wondered how much difference children’s early experiences would
actually make. Could we, or parents, predict how a child would do in school
from what the parent was doing when the child was 2 years old?
Fortune provided us with Dale Walker, who recruited 29 of the 42 families to
participate in a study of their children’s school performance in the third
grade, when the children were nine to 10 years old.
We were awestruck at how well our measures of accomplishments at age 3
predicted measures of language skill at age 9-10. From our preschool data we
had been confident that the rate of vocabulary growth would predict later
performance in school; we saw that it did. For the 29 children observed when
they were 1-2 years old, the rate of vocabulary growth at age 3 was strongly
associated with scores at age 9-10 on both the Peabody Picture Vocabulary
Test-Revised (PPVT-R) of receptive vocabulary (r = .58) and the Test of
Language Development-2: Intermediate (TOLD) (r = .74) and its subtests
(listening, speaking, semantics, syntax).
Vocabulary use at age 3 was equally predictive of measures of language skill
at age 9-10. Vocabulary use at age 3 was strongly associated with scores on
both the PPVT-R
(r = .57) and the TOLD (r = .72). Vocabulary use at age 3 was also strongly
associated with reading comprehension scores on the Comprehensive Test of
Basic Skills (CTBS/U)
(r = .56).
The 30 Million Word Gap By Age 3
All parent-child research is based on the assumption that the data
(laboratory or field) reflect what people typically do. In most studies,
there are as many reasons that the averages would be higher than reported as
there are that they would be lower. But all researchers caution against
extrapolating their findings to people and circumstances they did not
include. Our data provide us, however, a first approximation to the absolute
magnitude of children’s early experience, a basis sufficient for estimating
the actual size of the intervention task needed to provide equal experience
and, thus, equal opportunities to children living in poverty. We depend on
future studies to refine this estimate.
Because the goal of an intervention would be to equalize children’s early
experience, we need to estimate the amount of experience children of
different SES groups might bring to an intervention that began in preschool
at age 4. We base our estimate on the remarkable differences our data showed
in the relative amounts of children’s early experience: Simply in words
heard, the average child on welfare was having half as much experience per
hour (616 words per hour) as the average working-class child (1,251 words
per hour) and less than one-third that of the average child in a
professional family (2,153 words per hour). These relative differences in
amount of experience were so durable over the more than two years of
observations that they provide the best basis we currently have for
estimating children’s actual life experience.
A linear extrapolation from the averages in the observational data to a
100-hour week (given a 14-hour waking day) shows the average child in the
professional families with 215,000 words of language experience, the average
child in a working-class family provided with 125,000 words, and the average
child in a welfare family with 62,000 words of language experience. In a
5,200-hour year, the amount would be 11.2 million words for a child in a
professional family, 6.5 million words for a child in a working-class
family, and 3.2 million words for a child in a welfare family. In four years
of such experience, an average child in a professional family would have
accumulated experience with almost 45 million words, an average child in a
working-class family would have accumulated experience with 26 million
words, and an average child in a welfare family would have accumulated
experience with 13 million words. By age 4, the average child in a welfare
family might have 13 million fewer words of cumulative experience than the
average child in a working-class family. This linear extrapolation is shown
in the graph below.
 |
But the children’s language experience did not differ just
in terms of the number and quality of words heard. We can extrapolate
similarly the relative differences the data showed in children’s hourly
experience with parent affirmatives (encouraging words) and prohibitions.
The average child in a professional family was accumulating 32 affirmatives
and five prohibitions per hour, a ratio of 6 encouragements to 1
discouragement. The average child in a working-class family was accumulating
12 affirmatives and seven prohibitions per hour, a ratio of 2 encouragements
to 1 discouragement. The average child in a welfare family, though, was
accumulating five affirmatives and 11 prohibitions per hour, a ratio of 1
encouragement to 2 discouragements. In a 5,200-hour year, that would be
166,000 encouragements to 26,000 discouragements in a professional family,
62,000 encouragements to 36,000 discouragements in a working-class family,
and 26,000 encouragements to 57,000 discouragements in a welfare family.
Extrapolated to the first four years of life, the average child in a
professional family would have accumulated 560,000 more instances of
encouraging feedback than discouraging feedback, and an average child in a
working-class family would have accumulated 100,000 more encouragements than
discouragements. But an average child in a welfare family would have
accumulated 125,000 more instances of prohibitions than encouragements. By
the age of 4, the average child in a welfare family might have had 144,000
fewer encouragements and 84,000 more
discouragements of his or her behavior than the average child in a
working-class family.
Extrapolating the relative differences in children’s hourly experience
allows us to estimate children’s cumulative experience in the first four
years of life and so glimpse the size of the problem facing intervention.
Whatever the inaccuracy of our estimates, it is not by an order of magnitude
such that 60,000 words becomes 6,000 or 600,000. Even if our estimates of
children’s experience are too high by half, the differences between children
by age 4 in amounts of cumulative experience are so great that even the best
of intervention programs could only hope to keep the children in families on
welfare from falling still further behind the children in the working-class
families.
The Importance of Early Years Experience
We learned from the longitudinal data that the problem of skill differences
among children at the time of school entry is bigger, more intractable, and
more important than we had thought. So much is happening to children during
their first three years at home, at a time when they are especially
malleable and uniquely dependent on the family for virtually all their
experience, that by age 3, an intervention must address not just a lack of
knowledge or skill, but an entire general approach to experience.
Cognitively, experience is sequential: Experiences in infancy establish
habits of seeking, noticing, and incorporating new and more complex
experiences, as well as schemas for categorizing and thinking about
experiences. Neurologically, infancy is a critical period because cortical
development is influenced by the amount of central nervous system activity
stimulated by experience. Behaviorally, infancy is a unique time of
helplessness when nearly all of children’s experience is mediated by adults
in one-to-one interactions permeated with affect. Once children become
independent and can speak for themselves, they gain access to more
opportunities for experience. But the amount and diversity of children’s
past experience influences which new opportunities for experience they
notice and choose.
Estimating, as we did, the magnitude of the differences in children’s
cumulative experience before the age of 3 gives an indication of how big the
problem is. Estimating the hours of intervention needed to equalize
children’s early experience makes clear the enormity of the effort that
would be required to change children’s lives. And the longer the effort is
put off, the less possible the change becomes. We see why our brief, intense
efforts during the War on Poverty did not succeed. But we also see the risk
to our nation and its children that makes intervention more urgent than
ever.
Betty Hart is professor of Human Development at the
University of Kansas and senior scientist at the Schiefelbusch Institute for
Life Span Studies. Todd R. Risley is professor in the Department of
Psychology at the University of Alaska Anchorage and director of Alaska’s
Autism Intensive Early Intervention Project. The two have collaborated on
research projects for more then 35 years. This article is excerpted with
permission from Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of Young
American Children, Copyright 1995, Brookes;
www.brookespublishing.com,
1-800-638-3775; $29.00.

Articles may be
reproduced for noncommercial personal or educational use only; additional
permission is required for any other reprinting of the documents.

|