American Federation of Teachers - A Union of Professionals

Skip directly to:

AFT - A Union of ProfessionalsTeachersHigher EducationPSRPPublic EmployeesHealthcareRetireesEarly Childhood Educators

Home > Press Center > Speeches, Columns and Ads > Where We Stand > 2003 > The Wrong Bottom Line

The Wrong Bottom Line

    Print 

AFT President Sandra Feldmanby AFT President Sandra Feldman
February, 2003

Short-sighted school funding cuts
will do long-term harm to our kids.
 



New York Times
education writer Jacques Steinberg recently painted a disturbing picture of impending educational disaster at the Jeremiah E. Burke High School in Boston. Steinberg reported that state and city budget cuts had eliminated 12 Burke teachers, resulting in class sizes of 30 or more and an increase in disciplinary problems. What makes this story especially tragic—and instructive—is that these cutbacks reverse policies that led to the school’s remarkable turnaround a few years earlier.

In 1995, Burke was doing so poorly that it lost its state accreditation. Instead of giving up, the school used state and community support to make improvements. It reduced average class size from 34 to 20, raised academic standards, and hired much-needed teachers and aides.

While turning around a struggling school is never easy, the reforms adopted so effectively by the Burke community have proven successful in troubled schools all across the country, from Seattle to Baltimore and Hartford. They are reforms that work. But they also require additional resources, and too many lawmakers and public officials are using revenue shortfalls as an excuse to cut education funding. They’re looking at the wrong bottom line and turning tough budget choices into bad education policies.

When it comes to education and other public services, “short-term solutions” are often a contradiction in terms. The cutbacks at Burke High School represent half of the instructors hired to turn the school around; letting them go will have long-term consequences for many students there.

These are not easy times for our schools. Every day brings new threats, from budget cuts to phony cure-alls like vouchers. But improving our public schools can’t be done on the cheap. It can’t be done through bake sales, vending machines, or auctions. And it can’t be done by cutting taxes for the wealthy. It requires spending wisely on what works. And it requires local, state and, especially, national leaders to make education a priority.

The recently enacted “No Child Left Behind” law makes especially critical the need for adequate, sensible, and targeted federal funding to help improve our public schools. And fulfilling the goals of this law will require Congress and the President to match their rhetoric with the investment they promised. Equally important, it will require a sustained commitment, especially to vulnerable urban schools that have recently been making real progress. If these things don’t happen, we will quickly see how easily even the most disciplined school can fall into a downward spiral.  

HomeContact UsSite Map

 

 Advanced Search

FACTS:

  • 37 states cut a combined $12.8 billion from FY 2002 budgets that had already been enacted.
  • More than 100 school districts in 7 states have switched to a 4-day week this school year, primarily to save money.
  • Across the country, budget cuts are forcing parents and students to raise money to pay for teachers and teachers aides who would otherwise be let go.
  • The federal FY 2003 education budget has yet to be enacted, leaving states uncertain about what to expect and unable to plan for the future.
people picture
American Federation of Teachers | 555 New Jersey Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001

© American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer
Photographs and illustrations, as well as text, cannot be used without permission from the AFT.